🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in resting places at risk from coastal erosion state that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the problem is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation details a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure locations. Authorities say it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

One resident remembered a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Along the shoreline is situated the grave of a former paratrooper killed while serving overseas. His mother expressed she could not sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to think this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

The lack of consensus over when and how to tackle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families want additional coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Different voices argue the time for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with residents.”

He added there was time to weigh all the options. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. It requires good local conversations to discover the right solutions for each community.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was described as one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, providing a spiritual perspective on the temporal loss of sacred ground.