🔗 Share this article

Iran is prepared to reinitiate atomic discussions with the United States as long as it is treated with "respect" and "honor", Iran's foreign minister has declared.

Abbas Araghchi said exclusively dialogue was effective, and disclosed recent overtures had originated from intermediaries to reopen discussions with the Trump administration. He asserted Iran had zero unreported enrichment locations, and Iran could not yet permit the global atomic watchdog to inspect bombed nuclear sites for protective measures.

Walking a Difficult Route

The foreign minister is walking a complex course since Iran wishes not to appear to be proceeding from a stance of vulnerability, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had emerged stronger defensively and emotionally from the coordinated strike on its enrichment centers in June.

He was talking at a security conference in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "an absolute privilege to process nuclear material within its borders that it will perpetually retain" – the primary cause of the impasse in the prior discussions.

Prior Talks Abruptly Concluded

The previous five rounds of discussions between the United States and Iran were brought to an abrupt and bitter end on 12 June when the Israeli government, with US support, attacked Tehran's atomic facilities in a 12-day war that culminated with the American leader declaring the facilities had been eliminated. Following this, EU nations used their authority to restore global restrictions, but Iran maintains they have not had a substantial consequence.

Magic Solution Offered

Tehran representatives claimed they felt they had achieved a "magic solution" to the nuclear fuel concern in previous talks, when it was agreed an domestic cooperative with American involvement could refine atomic fuel. Each party would have been able to assert triumph since local refinement would have persisted and the US could be confident that Iran's nuclear programme was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been agreed in the negotiations that US nuclear scientists could operate on Iranian soil, but that was a reasonable assumption of the cooperative offer. Representatives asserted repeatedly they had secured an understanding with Trump's special envoy the American negotiator only for the arrangement to disintegrate due to "opponents in the US".

Present Position

Iranian officials said the partnership proposal was now no longer available, but it seems very probable the offer could be resurrected in various formats if negotiations restart.

The US president in recent days stated he had been getting signals that Iran sought to reopen negotiations, but privately Tehran representatives state they are not yet getting clear proposals from America either straightforwardly or from significant local go-betweens, such as Qatar, the Egyptian leadership, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Iran's state department has been accused of passivity in the aftermath of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Tehran says diplomacy is not part of a show.

Political Stance

In his address to the conference, designed to depict the US as a hegemonic power that abuses the notion of worldwide standards, the foreign minister said the two-week conflict demonstrated the conflict could not be settled by armed force. He said the assaults began with a American requirement for an unconditional Iranian surrender and concluded with an unconditional call for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is assured the first strikes by Israel were executed with full US knowledge and cooperation, making confidence hard to reestablish.

Negotiations Continues the Primary Resolution

The foreign minister declared: "Tehran was not the one that had abandoned diplomacy; it was the United States and the Western nations that had consistently sought to impose their desires during the talks. Dialogue can still be viable and remains the primary answer to resolve conflicts, but its criteria, rules and tenets must be followed."

"Provided that they address to the citizens of Tehran with the tone of dignity and respect, they will receive a answer in the identical tone."

Repair and Rebuilding

In what is characterized by Iran's diplomats as the battle of restoration and reconstruction, Araghchi stated he was assured Iran's security strengths "are considerably enhanced than before 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been restored. We gained multiple understandings from this conflict; we have identified our internal vulnerabilities and the vulnerabilities of the opponent."

He continued: "We managed to survive this conflict. Our nuclear technology, which they planned to eliminate, remains in place. The facilities and equipment, if eliminated, will be restored; what is crucial is the resolve of the nation of Iran and then the unity of the country that they targeted, but did not succeed to shatter. The citizens of Tehran have become stronger, more cohesive, and more supportive of the administration and the state in the aftermath of this assault."