🔗 Share this article

The Australian decisive action to ban social networking access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate worldwide. Officials, campaigners, and parents are observing with great interest to see if this approach will set a precedent for other nations.

The European Trend

Throughout Europe, a growing chorus of states are considering similar restrictions.

• Denmark plans a restriction on social media for youth below 15, with the leader arguing that smartphones and platforms are "taking away our children's youth". A law could be passed in the coming year.
• Norway is planning to enforce a access barrier of 15, citing the need to protect the young from the "manipulative force of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is introducing a digital wallet to verify the identity and age of social media users. The media minister have indicated that an Australia-style ban could be "an options under consideration".
• In Spain, the prime minister has called on lawmakers to pass a proposal lifting the legal age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has floated the idea of a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has suggested a related step, including an overnight "screen time restriction" for adolescents.
• The government in The Netherlands has advised families to block their children from social media up to the age of 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has adopted a symbolic motion calling for a ban for teenagers under 16 except if a parent decides otherwise is provided. While it warns of the "compulsive" quality of these apps, the resolution does not establish enforceable legislation.

"A strong age barrier is a useful starting point," commented a leading European lawmaker supporting the initiative.

The United Kingdom: A Watchful Eye

For the United Kingdom, the leadership has kept open a possible ban, stating that "no measure is discarded" but insisting any decision must be "grounded in conclusive research".

Previously, support grew behind a legislative effort to impose restrictions on social media use by teenagers, but it was eventually weakened. Instead, the administration pledged to investigate the matter.

Charities have voiced concerns. A prominent charity set up by the family of a teenager who was lost after encountering disturbing social media material argues that a strict age ban could fail to improve online safety and could result in a "cliff edge" of exposure when young people become eligible.

"This ban is a reaction to the refusal of the tech sector to build products and services that are appropriate and age appropriate for young users," commented a prominent child protection advocate.

The United States: A State-by-State Picture

Stateside, regulation is mostly happening at the local level against a backdrop of national stalemate.

• The state of Utah requires parental consent for those under 18 to use social media and controls nighttime use.
• The state of Florida has enacted a bill barring children under fourteen from accessing social media, though it faces constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a regulation restricting minors to a single hour of social media time per day, with any further time dependent on parental permission.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly passed laws demanding guardian approval for under-16s to set up social media accounts.

Despite cross-party agreement and suggestions from various figures to copy Australia's lead, a nationwide ban is currently seen as improbable.

International Perspectives

Outside of these regions, additional states are also taking action.

• Malaysia aims to restrict social media for those under sixteen beginning next year.
• Brazil has increased the minimum age for the platform Instagram to 16.

But, global bodies take a more measured tone. Unicef has cautioned that age-based restrictions carry risks and "might prove counterproductive". The agency highlights that social networks can be a "critical link" for vulnerable children and that regulation should not be a "replacement" for tech companies to invest in safety.

Even as this global discussion evolves, the policies of the Australian government and several other countries demonstrate that governments internationally are no longer content to wait for tech companies to act voluntarily.